온라인문의

bNExXkXdXqKm

2022.01.29 02:51

Magic

조회 수8

An accountancy practice clomid balkan pharmaceuticals I kept waiting for the authors to define “science,” but I was left unsatisfied. The authors’ thesis appears to be “people disagree, so it’s not a science.” Um, if this is how it works, I think someone forgot to inform Copernicus. They do have an interesting quote about how some economic disagreements can’t be resolved by even the best data, but, unfortunately for the authors, I don’t think that most economists would agree with the quote. Furthermore, even when economists do agree with the principle, they understand that much of the disagreement is about normative value judgments, which are a bit removed from the actual science of economics. (In other words, just because you see a decent amount of economists playing armchair political philosopher doesn’t mean that economics is political philosophy.)

댓글 쓰기

비회원 프로필 이미지
댓글 0